Duration of the normal working week: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Created page with "{{Indicator |datatype = Numeric |scale = Metric |valuelabels = <ul> <li>0 = 50 hours or more/no limit</li> <li>1 = 35 hours or less</li> normalised scale ranging from 0 to 1..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
|codingrules = The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale of the indicator was normalised so that "0" corresponds to | |codingrules = The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale of the indicator was normalised so that "0" corresponds to 50 hours or more and "1" to 35 hours or less. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016). | ||
|citation = | |citation = | ||
Revision as of 17:24, 9 June 2020
| Quick info | |
|---|---|
| Data type | Numeric |
| Scale | Metric |
| Value labels |
|
| Technical name | labor_workweek |
| Category | Labour and labour market |
| Label | Duration of the normal working week |
| Related indicators | |
This CBR-LRI indicator measures the maximum duration of the normal working week exclusive of overtime.
Coding rules
The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale of the indicator was normalised so that "0" corresponds to 50 hours or more and "1" to 35 hours or less. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).
Bibliographic info
Citation:
- Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations 33 (1): 59–91. http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004
Related publications:
- Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y
- Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x
Misc
Project manager(s):
- Jean-Yves Gerlitz
Data release:
Revisions:
Sources
- Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130