Standard-setting function - Revision history

Hfechner at 11:49, 5 February 2025

2025-02-05T11:49:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 5 February 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:
	<li>[[Privileging function]]</li>		<li>[[Privileging function]]</li>
	<li>[[Equalising function]]</li>		<li>[[Equalising function]]</li>
			<li>[[Legally mandated notice period]]</li>
			<li>[[Legally mandated redundancy compensation]]</li>
			<li>[[Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal]]</li>
			<li>[[Law imposes substantive constraints on dismissal]]</li>
			<li>[[Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal]]</li>
			<li>[[Annual leave entitlements]]</li>
			<li>[[Public holiday entitlements]]</li>
			<li>[[Overtime premia]]</li>
			<li>[[Weekend working]]</li>
			<li>[[Limits to overtime working]]</li>
			<li>[[Duration of the normal working week]]</li>
			<li>[[Maximum daily working time]]</li>
			<li>[[Notification of dismissal]]</li>
	</ul>		</ul>
	\|description =		\|description =
Line 45:		Line 58:
	<li> Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger (2022). Worlds of Labour: Introducing the Standard-Setting, Privileging and Equalising Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law, Industrial Law Journal, 51(3), p.560–597</li>		<li> Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger (2022). Worlds of Labour: Introducing the Standard-Setting, Privileging and Equalising Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law, Industrial Law Journal, 51(3), p.560–597</li>
	</ul>		</ul>
	\|projectmanagers = Responsible for data editing, calculation, description (WESIS) and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025); Responsible for data coding: Heiner Fechner (2018-2025), Marina Carlino (2022-2025); Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger; Student assistants for coding (alphabetical ordering): Julia Bode, Jessica Bonn, Daniel Euler, Jan-Christopher Floren, Maxime Fischer, Jennifer Götte, Eliko Hagen, Désirée Hoppe, Irina Kyburz, Alexandra Kojnow, Tarek Mahmalat, Karolin Meyer, Oguz Mermut, Johanna Nold, Tanusha Pali, Johannes Ramsauer, Max Sudhoff, Kristina Walter, Caroline Zambiasi		\|projectmanagers = Responsible for data editing, calculation, description (WESIS) and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025), Heiner Fechner (2018-2025); Responsible for data coding: Heiner Fechner (2018-2025), Marina Carlino (2022-2025); Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger; Student assistants for coding (alphabetical ordering): Julia Bode, Jessica Bonn, Daniel Euler, Jan-Christopher Floren, Maxime Fischer, Jennifer Götte, Eliko Hagen, Désirée Hoppe, Irina Kyburz, Alexandra Kojnow, Tarek Mahmalat, Karolin Meyer, Oguz Mermut, Johanna Nold, Tanusha Pali, Johannes Ramsauer, Max Sudhoff, Kristina Walter, Caroline Zambiasi
	\|datarelease =		\|datarelease =
	<ul>		<ul>

ASchaefer at 10:57, 5 December 2024

2024-12-05T10:57:11Z

Show changes

Nils Duepont at 12:39, 7 August 2023

2023-08-07T12:39:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:39, 7 August 2023
Line 28:		Line 28:
	\|citation =		\|citation =
	Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2022. "Worlds of Labour: Introducing the Standard-Setting, Privileging and Equalising Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''Industrial Law Journal'' 51 (3): 560–597. [https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab016 https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab016]		Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2022. "Worlds of Labour: Introducing the Standard-Setting, Privileging and Equalising Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''Industrial Law Journal'' 51 (3): 560–597. [https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab016 https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab016]

	\|relatedpublications =		\|relatedpublications =
	<ul>		<ul>
Line 37:		Line 36:
	<li>Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li>		<li>Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li>
	</ul>		</ul>
	\|projectmanagers =		\|projectmanagers = Andrea Schäfer
	Andrea Schäfer

	\|datarelease = <ul><li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li></ul>		\|datarelease = <ul><li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li></ul>
	\|revisions = No revisions yet		\|revisions = No revisions yet

	\|sources =		\|sources =
	<ul>		<ul>

Nils Duepont at 12:32, 7 August 2023

2023-08-07T12:32:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:32, 7 August 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\|datatype = Numeric		\|datatype = Numeric
	\|scale = Metric		\|scale = Metric
	\|valuelabels = ~~<ul>~~		\|valuelabels = Not applicable
	~~<li> 0 to 1. 1 is the maximum value, it reflects the highest possible level of general worker protection. </li>~~
	~~</ul>~~
	\|techname = labor_stand_sett_func		\|techname = labor_stand_sett_func
	\|category = [[Labour and labour market \|Labour and labour market]]		\|category = [[Labour and labour market \|Labour and labour market]]
Line 25:		Line 23:
	<li>[[Third body notification of dismissal]]</li>		<li>[[Third body notification of dismissal]]</li>
	</ul>		</ul>
	\|description = The standard-setting function measures the level of general worker protection in individual labour law. The function refers to active norm-setting that defines general standards of legal protection. It consists of two relevant dimensions, working time restriction and dismissal protection, that are measured by 13 indicators based on legal norms.		\|description = The standard-setting function measures the level of general worker protection in individual labour law. The function refers to active norm-setting that defines general standards of legal protection. It consists of two relevant dimensions, working time restriction and dismissal protection, that are measured by 13 indicators based on legal norms. The indicator ranges from 0 to 1 where 1 is the maximum value reflecting the highest possible level of general worker protection.
	\|codingrules = The index calculation solely relies on 13 CBR-LRI indicators: Annual leave entitlements, Public holiday entitlements, Overtime premia, Weekend working, Limits to overtime working, Duration of the normal working week, Maximum daily working time, Legally mandated notice period, Legally mandated redundancy compensation, Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal, Law imposes substantive constraints on dismissal, Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal and Third body notification of dismissal.		\|codingrules = The index calculation solely relies on 13 CBR-LRI indicators: Annual leave entitlements, Public holiday entitlements, Overtime premia, Weekend working, Limits to overtime working, Duration of the normal working week, Maximum daily working time, Legally mandated notice period, Legally mandated redundancy compensation, Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal, Law imposes substantive constraints on dismissal, Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal and Third body notification of dismissal.
	We calculated the mean of all indicators of one dimension, and again the mean of all dimensions of the function, thereby assigning equal weights to each dimension, and thus equal weights to all indicators of one dimension. The scales of the dimensions working time and dismissal protection are normalised, that is, we divided them by their empirical maximum.		We calculated the mean of all indicators of one dimension, and again the mean of all dimensions of the function, thereby assigning equal weights to each dimension, and thus equal weights to all indicators of one dimension. The scales of the dimensions working time and dismissal protection are normalised, that is, we divided them by their empirical maximum.
	\|citation =		\|citation =
	Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. ~~2020~~. "~~Measuring~~ Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''~~SOCIUM SFB 1342 Working Papers No. 5~~''~~, Bremen~~: ~~SOCIUM, University of Bremen~~. [https://~~www~~.~~socialpolicydynamics~~.de/f/~~90e3891ffd.pdf~~ https://~~www~~.~~socialpolicydynamics~~.de/f/~~90e3891ffd.pdf~~]		Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2022. "Worlds of Labour: Introducing the Standard-Setting, Privileging and Equalising Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''Industrial Law Journal'' 51 (3): 560–597. [https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab016 https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwab016]
	Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. FORTHCOMING. "Worlds of Labour: Introducing the SPE Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." Manuscript under review at the ''Industrial Law Journal''.

	\|relatedpublications =		\|relatedpublications =
	<ul>		<ul>
	<li>		<li>Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2020. "Measuring Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''SOCIUM SFB 1342 Working Papers No. 5'', Bremen: SOCIUM, University of Bremen. [https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf]</li>
	Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y]		<li>Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y]</li>
	<li>		<li>Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91. [http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004]</li>
	Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91. [http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004]		<li>Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x]</li>
	<li>		<li>Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li>
	Deakin, Simon, Jonas Malmberg, and Prabirjit Sarkar. 2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010". International Labour Review 153 (1): 1-27. [https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x]
	<li>
	Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]~~</li>~~
	</li>
	</ul>		</ul>
	\|projectmanagers =		\|projectmanagers =

Stecor at 14:22, 8 November 2021

2021-11-08T14:22:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:22, 8 November 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\|datatype = Numeric		\|datatype = Numeric
	\|scale = Metric		\|scale = Metric
	\|valuelabels = 0 to 1. 1 is the maximum value, it reflects the highest possible level of general worker protection.		\|valuelabels = <ul>
			<li> 0 to 1. 1 is the maximum value, it reflects the highest possible level of general worker protection. </li>
			</ul>
	\|techname = labor_stand_sett_func		\|techname = labor_stand_sett_func
	\|category = [[Labour and labour market \|Labour and labour market]]		\|category = [[Labour and labour market \|Labour and labour market]]

Stecor at 14:22, 8 November 2021

2021-11-08T14:22:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:22, 8 November 2021
Line 27:		Line 27:
	We calculated the mean of all indicators of one dimension, and again the mean of all dimensions of the function, thereby assigning equal weights to each dimension, and thus equal weights to all indicators of one dimension. The scales of the dimensions working time and dismissal protection are normalised, that is, we divided them by their empirical maximum.		We calculated the mean of all indicators of one dimension, and again the mean of all dimensions of the function, thereby assigning equal weights to each dimension, and thus equal weights to all indicators of one dimension. The scales of the dimensions working time and dismissal protection are normalised, that is, we divided them by their empirical maximum.
	\|citation =		\|citation =
	~~<ul>~~		Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2020. "Measuring Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''SOCIUM SFB 1342 Working Papers No. 5'', Bremen: SOCIUM, University of Bremen. [https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf]
	~~<li>~~Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. 2020. "Measuring Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." ''SOCIUM SFB 1342 Working Papers No. 5'', Bremen: SOCIUM, University of Bremen. [https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf https://www.socialpolicydynamics.de/f/90e3891ffd.pdf]		Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. FORTHCOMING. "Worlds of Labour: Introducing the SPE Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." Manuscript under review at the ''Industrial Law Journal''.
	~~<li>~~Dingeldey, Irene, Heiner Fechner, Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Jenny Hahs, and Ulrich Mückenberger. FORTHCOMING. "Worlds of Labour: Introducing the SPE Typology as a Measure of Legal Segmentation in Labour Law." Manuscript under review at the ''Industrial Law Journal''.
	~~</ul>~~
	\|relatedpublications =		\|relatedpublications =
	<ul>		<ul>
Line 44:		Line 43:
	</ul>		</ul>
	\|projectmanagers =		\|projectmanagers =
	<ul>		Andrea Schäfer
	<li>~~Andrea Schäfer~~</li>
	</ul>		\|datarelease = <ul><li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li></ul>
	\|~~datarelease~~ =		\|revisions = No revisions yet
	~~\|revisions =~~
	\|sources =		\|sources =
	<ul>		<ul>

ASchaefer at 14:09, 19 May 2021

2021-05-19T14:09:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:09, 19 May 2021
Line 8:		Line 8:
	\|relatedindicators =		\|relatedindicators =
	<ul>		<ul>
	~~<li>[[Type of employment law]]</li>~~
	<li>[[Privileging function]]</li>		<li>[[Privileging function]]</li>
	<li>[[Equalising function]]</li>		<li>[[Equalising function]]</li>

ASchaefer at 07:43, 19 May 2021

2021-05-19T07:43:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:43, 19 May 2021
Line 24:		Line 24:
	<li>[[Third body notification of dismissal]]</li>		<li>[[Third body notification of dismissal]]</li>
	</ul>		</ul>
	\|description = The standard-setting function ~~captures~~ the level of general worker protection in individual labour law. The function refers to active norm-setting that defines general standards of legal protection. It consists of two relevant dimensions, working time restriction and dismissal protection, that are measured by 13 indicators based on legal norms.		\|description = The standard-setting function measures the level of general worker protection in individual labour law. The function refers to active norm-setting that defines general standards of legal protection. It consists of two relevant dimensions, working time restriction and dismissal protection, that are measured by 13 indicators based on legal norms.
	\|codingrules = The index calculation solely relies on 13 CBR-LRI indicators: Annual leave entitlements, Public holiday entitlements, Overtime premia, Weekend working, Limits to overtime working, Duration of the normal working week, Maximum daily working time, Legally mandated notice period, Legally mandated redundancy compensation, Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal, Law imposes substantive constraints on dismissal, Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal and Third body notification of dismissal.		\|codingrules = The index calculation solely relies on 13 CBR-LRI indicators: Annual leave entitlements, Public holiday entitlements, Overtime premia, Weekend working, Limits to overtime working, Duration of the normal working week, Maximum daily working time, Legally mandated notice period, Legally mandated redundancy compensation, Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal, Law imposes substantive constraints on dismissal, Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal and Third body notification of dismissal.
	We calculated the mean of all indicators of one dimension, and again the mean of all dimensions of the function, thereby assigning equal weights to each dimension, and thus equal weights to all indicators of one dimension. The dimensions working time and dismissal protection ~~showed empirical maxima below ‘1’ over the period of 43 years. We therefore~~ normalised ~~their scales~~, that is, we divided them by their empirical maximum.		We calculated the mean of all indicators of one dimension, and again the mean of all dimensions of the function, thereby assigning equal weights to each dimension, and thus equal weights to all indicators of one dimension. The scales of the dimensions working time and dismissal protection are normalised, that is, we divided them by their empirical maximum.
	\|citation =		\|citation =
	<ul>		<ul>
Line 47:		Line 47:
	<ul>		<ul>
	<li>Andrea Schäfer</li>		<li>Andrea Schäfer</li>
	~~<li>Jean-Yves Gerlitz</li>~~
	</ul>		</ul>
	\|datarelease =		\|datarelease =

ASchaefer at 07:28, 19 May 2021

2021-05-19T07:28:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:28, 19 May 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:
	\|datatype = Numeric		\|datatype = Numeric
	\|scale = Metric		\|scale = Metric
	\|valuelabels = 0 to 1. ~~High values reflect a high~~ level of general worker protection.		\|valuelabels = 0 to 1. 1 is the maximum value, it reflects the highest possible level of general worker protection.
	\|techname = labor_stand_sett_func		\|techname = labor_stand_sett_func
	\|category = [[Labour and labour market \|Labour and labour market]]		\|category = [[Labour and labour market \|Labour and labour market]]

ASchaefer at 14:29, 18 May 2021

2021-05-18T14:29:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:29, 18 May 2021
Line 44:		Line 44:
	</li>		</li>
	</ul>		</ul>
	\|projectmanagers = Andrea Schäfer, Jean-Yves Gerlitz		\|projectmanagers =
			<ul>
			<li>Andrea Schäfer</li>
			<li>Jean-Yves Gerlitz</li>
			</ul>
	\|datarelease =		\|datarelease =
	\|revisions =		\|revisions =