Redundancy selection - Revision history

Hfechner: Redirected page to Redundancy selection (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)

2025-12-15T14:03:40Z

Redirected page to Redundancy selection (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 15 December 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	#REDIRECT [[Redundancy selection (WoL~~, V2~~)]]		#REDIRECT [[Redundancy selection (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]

Hfechner: Redirected page to Redundancy selection (WoL, V2)

2025-12-11T20:21:19Z

Redirected page to Redundancy selection (WoL, V2)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:21, 11 December 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~{{IndicatorForm~~		#REDIRECT [[Redundancy selection (WoL, V2)]]
	~~\|datatype=Numeric~~
	~~\|scale=Metric~~
	~~\|scale=Metric~~
	~~\|scale=Metric~~
	~~\|valuelabels=Not applicable~~
	~~\|techname=labor_redund_select~~
	~~\|category=Labour and labour market~~
	~~\|label=Redundancy selection (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)~~
	~~\|relatedindicators=<ul>~~
	~~<li>[[Legally mandated notice period (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]</li>~~
	~~<li>[[Legally mandated redundancy compensation (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]</li>~~
	~~<li>[[Minimum qualifying period for unjust dismissal (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]</li>~~
	~~<li>[[Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]</li>~~
	~~<li>[[Law imposes substantive constraints on dismissal (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]</li>~~
	~~<li>[[Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]</li>~~
	~~<li>~~[[~~Third body notification of dismissal (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]</li>~~
	~~</ul>~~
	\|description=This variable is taken from the CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset (‘CBR-LRI’), which provides data on labor laws in 117 countries for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022, except for post-socialist countries (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The variable measures the priority rules, in the country's statutory or case law and relevant court decisions, for redundancy. The CBR-LRI data was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data. The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "1" corresponds to law or binding collective agreement where the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy and "0" to otherwise.
	\|codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). As Adams et al. (2023:19) describe, the value of the variable "Redundancy selection" "Equals 1 if by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law." (~~2023:19).~~
	The assessment of the scale levels of all variables in the CBR-LRI documentation and the specification of the values in the template are partially incongruent. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons.
	~~\|citation=<ul>~~
	~~<li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130</li>~~
	~~<li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2</li>~~
	~~</ul>~~
	~~\|relatedpublications=<ul>~~
	<li>Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. (2017). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130</li>
	<li>Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2</li>
	~~</ul>~~
	\|projectmanagers=Responsible for data editing, description (WeSIS) and upload: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025, Version 0.002), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-2020, Version 0.001); Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger; Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)
	~~\|datarelease=<ul>~~
	~~<li>Version 0.001: Initial release with data from CBR-LRI published in April 2017 (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2013)</li>~~
	~~<li>Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023~~, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) ~~1970 to 2022)</li>~~
	~~</ul>~~
	~~\|revisions=No revisions yet~~
	~~\|sources=<ul>~~
	~~<li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated~~]~~. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130</li>~~
	~~<li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023~~]~~. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2</li>~~
	~~</ul>~~
	}}

Hfechner at 19:45, 11 December 2025

2025-12-11T19:45:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:45, 11 December 2025
Line 7:		Line 7:
	\|techname=labor_redund_select		\|techname=labor_redund_select
	\|category=Labour and labour market		\|category=Labour and labour market
	\|label=Redundancy selection		\|label=Redundancy selection (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)
	\|relatedindicators=<ul>		\|relatedindicators=<ul>
	<li>[[Legally mandated notice period]]</li>		<li>[[Legally mandated notice period (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]</li>
	<li>[[Legally mandated redundancy compensation]]</li>		<li>[[Legally mandated redundancy compensation (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]</li>
	<li>[[Minimum qualifying period for unjust dismissal]]</li>		<li>[[Minimum qualifying period for unjust dismissal (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]</li>
	<li>[[Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal]]</li>		<li>[[Law imposes procedural constraints on dismissal (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]</li>
	<li>[[Law imposes substantive constraints on dismissal]]</li>		<li>[[Law imposes substantive constraints on dismissal (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]</li>
	<li>[[Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal]]</li>		<li>[[Reinstatement normal remedy for unfair dismissal (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]</li>
	<li>[[Third body notification of dismissal]]</li>		<li>[[Third body notification of dismissal (CBR-LRI, WoL V1)]]</li>
	</ul>		</ul>
	\|description=This variable is taken from the CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset (‘CBR-LRI’), which provides data on labor laws in 117 countries for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022, except for post-socialist countries (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The variable measures the priority rules, in the country's statutory or case law and relevant court decisions, for redundancy. The CBR-LRI data was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data. The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "1" corresponds to law or binding collective agreement where the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy and "0" to otherwise.		\|description=This variable is taken from the CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset (‘CBR-LRI’), which provides data on labor laws in 117 countries for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022, except for post-socialist countries (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The variable measures the priority rules, in the country's statutory or case law and relevant court decisions, for redundancy. The CBR-LRI data was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data. The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "1" corresponds to law or binding collective agreement where the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy and "0" to otherwise.

ASchaefer at 09:46, 28 November 2024

2024-11-28T09:46:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:46, 28 November 2024
Line 20:		Line 20:
	\|codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). As Adams et al. (2023:19) describe, the value of the variable "Redundancy selection" "Equals 1 if by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law." (2023:19).		\|codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). As Adams et al. (2023:19) describe, the value of the variable "Redundancy selection" "Equals 1 if by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law." (2023:19).
	The assessment of the scale levels of all variables in the CBR-LRI documentation and the specification of the values in the template are partially incongruent. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons.		The assessment of the scale levels of all variables in the CBR-LRI documentation and the specification of the values in the template are partially incongruent. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons.
	\|citation=<br>		\|citation=<ul>
	* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130		<li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130</li>
	* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2		<li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2</li>
	\|relatedpublications=<br>		</ul>
	* Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. (2017). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130		\|relatedpublications=<ul>
	* Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2		<li>Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. (2017). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130</li>
	\|projectmanagers=~~<br>~~		<li>Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2</li>
	* Responsible for data editing, description (~~WESIS~~) and ~~entry~~: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025, Version 0.002), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-20, ~~version~~ 0.001)		</ul>
	* Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger~~<br>~~		\|projectmanagers=Responsible for data editing, description (WeSIS) and upload: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025, Version 0.002), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-2020, Version 0.001); Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger; Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)
	* Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)		\|datarelease=<ul>
	\|datarelease=<br>		<li>Version 0.001: Initial release with data from CBR-LRI published in April 2017 (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2013)</li>
	* Version 0.001: Initial release with data from CBR-LRI published in April 2017 (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2013)		<li>Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022)</li>
	* Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022)		</ul>
	\|revisions=No revisions yet		\|revisions=No revisions yet
	\|sources=* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130		\|sources=<ul>
	* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2		<li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130</li>
			<li>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2</li>
			</ul>
	}}		}}

ASchaefer at 08:57, 27 November 2024

2024-11-27T08:57:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:57, 27 November 2024
Line 18:		Line 18:
	</ul>		</ul>
	\|description=This variable is taken from the CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset (‘CBR-LRI’), which provides data on labor laws in 117 countries for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022, except for post-socialist countries (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The variable measures the priority rules, in the country's statutory or case law and relevant court decisions, for redundancy. The CBR-LRI data was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data. The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "1" corresponds to law or binding collective agreement where the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy and "0" to otherwise.		\|description=This variable is taken from the CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset (‘CBR-LRI’), which provides data on labor laws in 117 countries for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022, except for post-socialist countries (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The variable measures the priority rules, in the country's statutory or case law and relevant court decisions, for redundancy. The CBR-LRI data was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data. The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "1" corresponds to law or binding collective agreement where the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy and "0" to otherwise.
	\|codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). The assessment of the scale level in the CBR-LRI documentation and the description of the values in the template are partially contradictory. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons. As Adams et al. (2023:19) describe, the value of the variable "Redundancy selection" "Equals 1 if by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law." (2023:19).		\|codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). As Adams et al. (2023:19) describe, the value of the variable "Redundancy selection" "Equals 1 if by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law." (2023:19).
			The assessment of the scale levels of all variables in the CBR-LRI documentation and the specification of the values in the template are partially incongruent. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons.
	\|citation=<br>		\|citation=<br>
	* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130		* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130

ASchaefer at 09:14, 26 November 2024

2024-11-26T09:14:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:14, 26 November 2024
Line 26:		Line 26:
	* Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2		* Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
	\|projectmanagers=<br>		\|projectmanagers=<br>
	* Responsible for data editing and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-20)		* Responsible for data editing, description (WESIS) and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025, Version 0.002), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-20, version 0.001)
	* Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger<br>		* Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger<br>
	* Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)		* Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)
Line 33:		Line 33:
	* Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022)		* Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022)
	\|revisions=No revisions yet		\|revisions=No revisions yet
	\|sources=~~<br>~~		\|sources=* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
	* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
	* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2		* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
	}}		}}

ASchaefer at 09:13, 26 November 2024

2024-11-26T09:13:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:13, 26 November 2024
Line 18:		Line 18:
	</ul>		</ul>
	\|description=This variable is taken from the CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset (‘CBR-LRI’), which provides data on labor laws in 117 countries for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022, except for post-socialist countries (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The variable measures the priority rules, in the country's statutory or case law and relevant court decisions, for redundancy. The CBR-LRI data was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data. The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "1" corresponds to law or binding collective agreement where the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy and "0" to otherwise.		\|description=This variable is taken from the CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset (‘CBR-LRI’), which provides data on labor laws in 117 countries for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022, except for post-socialist countries (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The variable measures the priority rules, in the country's statutory or case law and relevant court decisions, for redundancy. The CBR-LRI data was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data. The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "1" corresponds to law or binding collective agreement where the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy and "0" to otherwise.
	\|codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). The assessment of the scale level in the CBR-LRI documentation and the description of the values in the template are partially contradictory. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons. As Adams et al. (2023) describe, the value of the variable "Redundancy selection" "Equals 1 if by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law." (2023:19).		\|codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). The assessment of the scale level in the CBR-LRI documentation and the description of the values in the template are partially contradictory. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons. As Adams et al. (2023:19) describe, the value of the variable "Redundancy selection" "Equals 1 if by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law." (2023:19).
	\|citation=<br>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130~~<br>~~		\|citation=<br>
	Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2		* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
	\|relatedpublications=<br>Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. (2017). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130~~<br>~~		* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
	Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2		\|relatedpublications=<br>
	\|projectmanagers=<br>Responsible for data editing and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-20)~~<br>~~		* Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. (2017). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
	Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger<br>		* Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
	Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)		\|projectmanagers=<br>
	\|datarelease=<br>Version 0.001: Initial release with data from CBR-LRI published in April 2017 (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2013)~~<br>~~		* Responsible for data editing and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-20)
	Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022)		* Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger<br>
			* Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)
			\|datarelease=<br>
			* Version 0.001: Initial release with data from CBR-LRI published in April 2017 (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2013)
			* Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022)
	\|revisions=No revisions yet		\|revisions=No revisions yet
	\|sources=Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130~~<br>~~		\|sources=<br>
	Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2		* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130
			* Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
	}}		}}

ASchaefer at 15:20, 25 November 2024

2024-11-25T15:20:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:20, 25 November 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:
	\|scale=Metric		\|scale=Metric
	\|scale=Metric		\|scale=Metric
	\|valuelabels=~~<ul>~~		\|valuelabels=Not applicable
	~~<li>0 = employers does not have to follow priorty rules prior to dismissing for redundancy</li>~~
	~~<li>1 = by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority~~
	~~rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing~~
	~~for redundancy</li>~~
	~~quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law~~
	~~</ul>~~
	\|techname=labor_redund_select		\|techname=labor_redund_select
	\|category=Labour and labour market		\|category=Labour and labour market
Line 23:		Line 17:
	<li>[[Third body notification of dismissal]]</li>		<li>[[Third body notification of dismissal]]</li>
	</ul>		</ul>
	\|description=This CBR-LRI ~~indicator measures~~ to ~~what extent employers have~~ to follow priority rules based on ~~issues such as~~ seniority, marital status, number of dependants etc. prior to ~~a dismissal~~ for redundancy.		\|description=This variable is taken from the CBR Labour Regulation Index Dataset (‘CBR-LRI’), which provides data on labor laws in 117 countries for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022, except for post-socialist countries (see Adams et al. 2017, 2023). The variable measures the priority rules, in the country's statutory or case law and relevant court decisions, for redundancy. The CBR-LRI data was coded using provisions of law and relevant court decisions, which are taken from secondary sources, national law databases, and ILO NATLEX data. The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "1" corresponds to law or binding collective agreement where the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy and "0" to otherwise.
	\|codingrules=The ~~CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies~~ the ~~strength~~ of ~~protection expressed~~ in ~~labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see~~ Adams et al. 2017). The scale ~~ranges from "0"~~ to "1" ~~where "0" corresponds to not having to follow priority rules and~~ "1~~" to having to~~ follow priority rules prior to ~~a dismissal~~ for redundancy~~, and~~ gradations between ~~the two values~~ reflect ~~gradtions~~ in the strength of law. ~~For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin~~ (~~2016~~).		\|codingrules=The coding template (algorithm) with the definition of the variable and instructions for the coding process is described in Adams et al. (2017, 2023). The assessment of the scale level in the CBR-LRI documentation and the description of the values in the template are partially contradictory. The scale level was set uniformly to metric for all CBR-LRI data on collective rights in the 1st project phase of CRC 1342; this is retained for pragmatic reasons. As Adams et al. (2023) describe, the value of the variable "Redundancy selection" "Equals 1 if by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority rules based on seniority, marital status, number or dependants, etc., prior to dismissing for redundancy. Equals 0 otherwise. Scope for further gradations between 0 and 1 to reflect changes in the strength of the law." (2023:19).
	\|citation=~~Adams~~, ~~Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop~~, and ~~Simon Deakin.~~ 2017. ~~"The~~ CBR-~~LRI Dataset~~: ~~Methods~~, ~~Properties~~ and ~~Potential of~~ Leximetric ~~Coding of Labour Law~~.~~" ''International Journal~~ of ~~Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91~~. ~~[http~~://~~kluwerlawonline~~.~~com~~/~~abstract~~.~~php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http:/~~/~~kluwerlawonline~~.~~com/abstract~~.~~php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004]~~		\|citation=<br>Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130<br>
	\|relatedpublications=<~~ul>~~		Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
	~~<li~~>		\|relatedpublications=<br>Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. (2017). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. Centre for Business Research, Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130<br>
	Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. ~~2016~~. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://~~www.repository.cam.ac~~.uk/~~bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf~~.~~pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https:/~~/~~www.repository.cam.ac~~.~~uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y]~~		Adams, Zoe, Bhumika Billa, Louise Bishop, Simon Deakin and Tvisha Shroff (2023). CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries, 1970-2022) - Codes and Sources. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge. at: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
	<~~/li~~>		\|projectmanagers=<br>Responsible for data editing and entry: Andrea Schäfer (2021-2025), Jean-Yves Gerlitz (2018-20)<br>
	~~<li>~~		Principal Investigator: Irene Dingeldey, Ulrich Mückenberger<br>
	~~Deakin~~, ~~Simon~~, ~~Jonas Malmberg~~, and ~~Prabirjit Sarkar~~. ~~2014. "How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share~~ of ~~national income? The experience of six OECD countries~~, 1970-~~2010". International Labour Review 153 (1~~)~~: 1~~-27. [https:/~~/onlinelibrary.wiley.com~~/doi~~/epdf/10~~.~~1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf~~/10.~~1111~~/~~j.1564-913X~~.~~2014~~.~~00195.x]~~		Student assistants: Karolin Meyer (2018-2020)
	~~</li>~~		\|datarelease=<br>Version 0.001: Initial release with data from CBR-LRI published in April 2017 (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2013)<br>
	~~</ul>~~		Version 0.002: Updated with data from CBR-LRI 2023, V2* (data for the period from (in most cases) 1970 to 2022)
	\|projectmanagers=Jean-Yves Gerlitz, ~~Andrea Schäfer~~
	\|datarelease=<~~ul>~~
	~~<li~~>Version 0.001: Initial release<~~/li~~>
	~~</ul>~~
	\|revisions=No revisions yet		\|revisions=No revisions yet
	\|sources=~~<ul>~~		\|sources=Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2017). CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated]. [Dataset]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130<br>
	~~<li>~~ Deakin, Simon, ~~John~~ Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130~~]</li>~~		Deakin, Simon, Johna Armour and Mathias Siems (2023). CBR Leximetric Datasets [Updated 2023]. Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130.2
	~~</ul>~~
	}}		}}

Stecor at 13:24, 8 November 2021

2021-11-08T13:24:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:24, 8 November 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{IndicatorForm		{{IndicatorForm
	\|datatype = Numeric		\|datatype=Numeric
	\|scale = Metric		\|scale=Metric
	\|valuelabels =		\|scale=Metric
	<ul>		\|scale=Metric
			\|valuelabels=<ul>
	<li>0 = employers does not have to follow priorty rules prior to dismissing for redundancy</li>		<li>0 = employers does not have to follow priorty rules prior to dismissing for redundancy</li>
	<li>1 = by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority		<li>1 = by law or binding collective agreement the employer must follow priority
Line 10:		Line 11:
	quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law		quasi-metric scale; further gradations between 0 and 1 reflect changes in the strength of the law
	</ul>		</ul>
	\|techname = labor_redund_select		\|techname=labor_redund_select
	\|category = [[Labour and labour market ~~\|Labour and labour market]]~~		\|category=Labour and labour market
	\|label = Redundancy selection		\|label=Redundancy selection
	\|relatedindicators =		\|relatedindicators=<ul>
	<ul>
	<li>[[Legally mandated notice period]]</li>		<li>[[Legally mandated notice period]]</li>
	<li>[[Legally mandated redundancy compensation]]</li>		<li>[[Legally mandated redundancy compensation]]</li>
Line 23:		Line 23:
	<li>[[Third body notification of dismissal]]</li>		<li>[[Third body notification of dismissal]]</li>
	</ul>		</ul>
			\|description=This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent employers have to follow priority rules based on issues such as seniority, marital status, number of dependants etc. prior to a dismissal for redundancy.
	\|description =		\|codingrules=The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to not having to follow priority rules and "1" to having to follow priority rules prior to a dismissal for redundancy, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).
	This CBR-LRI indicator measures to what extent employers have to follow priority rules based on issues such as seniority, marital status, number of dependants etc. prior to a dismissal for redundancy.		\|citation=Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91. [http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004]
			\|relatedpublications=<ul>

	\|codingrules = The CBR-LRI is a leximetric dataset on employment protection. It quantifies the strength of protection expressed in labour law and functional equivalents such as administrative regulation and collective agreements (see Adams et al. 2017). The scale ranges from "0" to "1" where "0" corresponds to not having to follow priority rules and "1" to having to follow priority rules prior to a dismissal for redundancy, and gradations between the two values reflect gradtions in the strength of law. For country-specific information see Adams, Bishop and Deakin (2016).

	\|citation =
	~~<ul>~~
	~~<li>~~Adams, Zoe, Parisa Bastani, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2017. "The CBR-LRI Dataset: Methods, Properties and Potential of Leximetric Coding of Labour Law." ''International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations'' 33 (1): 59–91. [http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004 http://kluwerlawonline.com/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=IJCL2017004]
	~~</ul>~~

	\|relatedpublications =
	<ul>
	<li>		<li>
	Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y]		Adams, Zoe, Louise Bishop, and Simon Deakin. 2016. CBR Labour Regulation Index (Dataset of 117 Countries). Cambridge: Centre for Business Research. [https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/263766/CBR_LRI_Dataset_Codebook_Methodology_2017_pdf.pdf?sequence=16&isAllowed=y]
Line 44:		Line 34:
	</li>		</li>
	</ul>		</ul>
			\|projectmanagers=Jean-Yves Gerlitz, Andrea Schäfer
	\|projectmanagers =		\|datarelease=<ul>
	~~<ul>~~
	~~<li>~~Jean-Yves Gerlitz~~</li>~~
	~~<li>~~Andrea Schäfer~~</li>~~
	~~</ul>~~

	\|datarelease =
	<ul>
	<li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li>		<li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li>
	</ul>		</ul>
			\|revisions=No revisions yet
	\|revisions =		\|sources=<ul>
	~~<ul>~~
	~~<li>~~No revisions yet~~</li>~~
	~~</ul>~~

	\|sources =
	<ul>
	<li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li>		<li> Deakin, Simon, John Armour, and Mathias Siems. 2017. "CBR Leximetric Datasets [updated] [Dataset]". [https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130 https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.9130]</li>
	</ul>		</ul>
	}}		}}

Stecor at 15:48, 22 July 2021

2021-07-22T15:48:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 22 July 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~Indicator~~		{{IndicatorForm
	\|datatype = Numeric		\|datatype = Numeric
	\|scale = Metric		\|scale = Metric
Line 53:		Line 53:
	\|datarelease =		\|datarelease =
	<ul>		<ul>
	<li></li>		<li>Version 0.001: Initial release</li>
	</ul>		</ul>

	\|revisions =		\|revisions =
	<ul>		<ul>
	<li></li>		<li>No revisions yet</li>
	</ul>		</ul>